|
| Home > Quick-find all publications/papers/media/ listed here on one page > Cabinet Papers | |
|
||
|
Capping Core Government Administration
To download/print this page use the PDF version, attached above. See: Cabinet Paper and Cabinet Minute |
||
|
|
||
|
||
| ||
|
The Government expects the State Services to spend taxpayer's dollars wisely, efficiently, and on areas that improve services to New Zealanders. Capping the core government administration will make resources available for improved frontline services which is better value for money for New Zealand taxpayers. Defining the core government administrationCore government administration refers to:
Core government administration excludes:
Setting the cap on core government administrationThe cap on the size of core government administration has been set at 38,859 full time equivalent (FTE) staff positions. The cap is based on the number of FTE staff in core government administration plus unfilled vacancies as at 31 December 2008. The cap will be applied globally, to the total FTE staff in core government administration, not to individual organisations. The State Services Commissioner is responsible for overseeing the cap. Applying the cap allows for greater flexibility in rebalancing staff numbers and resources between and within organisations to focus on frontline service delivery across the State Services. Crown entities and non Public Service departments excluded from 'core government administration' are expected to exercise restraint in back office staffing and focus on frontline service delivery as appropriate to their functions. Reducing the number of communications and public relations staffThe Government is concerned at the growth in numbers of communications and public relations staff employed in the Public Service. When determining staffing levels in their departments, chief executives should take account of the Government's expectation that the number of communications and public relations advisors they employ will be reduced. Managing staff numbers within set baselinesOrganisations within core government administration provided 'establishment figures' to the SSC as at 31 December 2008, which were used to establish the global cap on core government administration. Each chief executive is responsible for managing their workforce within their establishment figures. Chief executives are expected to advise the State Services Commissioner (and for Crown entities, their Responsible Ministers) of any proposed increase in staff numbers beyond their establishment figures. Chief executives are also expected to advise the Commissioner of any proposed significant reduction in staff numbers. This will assist the Commissioner in overseeing the cap. Focusing on frontline service deliveryCapping the core government administration is about overall expenditure, not just staff numbers. It involves smarter ways of working to achieve improved service delivery and ensuring expenditure - including personnel expenditure - is carefully and appropriately managed within baseline budgets. The Government wants to see people and funding moved into areas that will deliver the best value for money and the best improvements to frontline services for New Zealanders. Improved frontline service delivery involves better people management, processes, shared services, and use of technology - this may involve changes to staffing frontline service delivery roles. Chief executives are responsible for managing their workforce within their establishment figures and baseline budgets, and for prioritising frontline service delivery. Monitoring the cap on core government administrationThe SSC will regularly engage with organisations and support their implementation of the cap on core government administration though the provision of information, guidance, and advice. The SSC and Treasury will review the effectiveness of capping core government administration, and report to Ministers in August 2009 and in early 2010. The review will include information on staffing levels, expenditure and frontline service prioritisation. The review will also consider implications for organisations and any consequences arising from the application of the cap on core government administration. |
||
|
|